From - Sat Feb 8 14:55:03 2003 Received: from phobos.email.Arizona.EDU (phobos-adm.email.Arizona.EDU [128.196.133.165]) by server.rupley.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA98333 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:40:56 -0700 (MST) Delivered-To: rupley@email.arizona.edu Received: from deimos.email.Arizona.EDU (128.196.133.166) by phobos.email.Arizona.EDU (6.0.053) id 3E43AAA80001D384 for rupley@email.arizona.edu; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:40:56 -0700 Received: from mail.ci.tucson.az.us (166.89.241.7) by deimos.email.Arizona.EDU (6.0.053) id 3E43ABD20001D2D8 for rupley@email.arizona.edu; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:40:56 -0700 Received: from GWDOM1-Message_Server by mail.ci.tucson.az.us with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:40:43 -0700 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:40:35 -0700 From: "Sarah More" To: Cc: , "James Maurer" , "Kathy Buchanan" , "Sarah More" , , , , Subject: Re: LRE ordinance Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.rupley.com id RAA98333 X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Chris, I'd be glad to: PC recommended adoption of the code amendment with the following changes: 1. eliminate the change(shaded part of the sentence)in g.2, on page 27 (hours of operation) 2. changes to last two paragraphs of section h. (noise abatement) on page 27 - note - this is from my notes, which I should check with Jim and Kathy on Monday, I am not clear on the second paragraph especially: The noise levels measured at residentially zoned or residentially develooped property lines adjacent to the site shall be no greater than 10 dB(A) above the ambient noise levels for those time periods 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The noise levels from devices, including, but not limited to, vehicle warning beepers, that emit impulse sounds or pure tones shall not be operated between the hours of 10:00 pm. and 7:00 a.m. 3. Recommend to the Mayor and Council that there be an immediate review of other commercial uses. 4. That the references to a site separation from residential be changed to a building setback in sections B.2.a and B.2.b on pages 16 & 17 and section C.1.a.2 on page 21. for the purposes of this email I will edit only the first part of one of the paragraphs here, we will edit all three on Monday. The LRE building is located a minimum distance of five hundred (500) feet from property that is residentially zoned or residentially developed...... Sarah S. More, AICP Planning Administrator Comprehensive Planning Task Force Mac Arthur Building - Third Floor 345 East Toole Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 Office Phone: (520) 791-4505 Fax: (520) 791-4522 Mobile Phone: (520) 603-2216 www.cityoftucson.org/planning >>> Chris Tanz 02/07/03 11:19AM >>> Dear Sarah, Could you please send me a list of the amendments that passed with the ordinance. thanks, Chris Tanz